GETTING MY H4831SC LOAD DATA TO WORK

Getting My h4831sc load data To Work

Getting My h4831sc load data To Work

Blog Article

Your session is going to timeout because of inactivity. Click on Alright to extend your time and efforts for an additional 0 minutes.

They have carried out identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to get the more recent SC version but have now switched back again. Preferably you need about a hundred% loading density. In case you have sufficient scenario capability with the H4831(prolonged) you're likely greater off.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I discovered this combo creates .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps outside of a 26" barrel. I exploit this identical powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr drugs, so It truly is nice to acquire a person powder for both.

Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or regular) and ton you will be employing nevertheless. Exact same burn off amount doesn't mean it will eventually behave "accurately" the exact same. I've viewed more than one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp plenty of H4831.

some cartridges are likely copper foul more than Many others though, no matter how smooth the complete is on the bore and involve cleaning of your copper fouling more often.

I've used H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem with no variation. The one thing will be the quick Lower provides you with somewhat more House. Good luck!gun)

i've employed equally and applied the very same expenses and also have not been ready to explain to any noticable discrepancies with effectiveness. the SC Model meters somewhat smoother is about all. any remarks??

excaliber mentioned: I have found the precise reverse being legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly exact powder in my three hundred Acquire Mag.

With all the smoother circulation features arrives extra uniform cost weights, even though the individual grains orient more compactly, producing improved loading density.

The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they've slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are much better. It bug the hell from me. I realize far better. That is why I don't ever toss out my more mature manuals. I do obtain new manual continuously to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ degrees with none issues.

Kansas City, MO I might seize no matter what is out there at the moment. I’ve used both even though with h4831sc my drop by load and didn’t see something diverse general performance wise.

Just after looking at this information (and plenty of Other people, but this just one is easily the most data driven with numerous accredited shooters) I've stopped worrying about touching or getting within a magical length in the lands, and began loading where I could optimize numerous aspects of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you may get a thing to operate for ya.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced significantly better pace and accuracy with H1000. I would relatively use a slower burning h4831sc load data powder with 215g tablets.

I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Immediately after months, I bought Blessed and caught some H1000 online and of course paid h4831 vs h4831sc a bit additional. The really following week at a gun show a man experienced a whole scenario of H1000 for $40 per 1lb. I forget just how much, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.

Report this page